THE SVARUPA OF MA'S PLAY OF SADHANA -
IN 'THAT' ONLY
In the Reality, where there is identity of 'mool-sthula, there, He who is as being all, without being too, it is He only. Therefore, the distinction of manifest-unmanifest is from the point of view of jiva only. He, who is manifest, it is He only who is unmanifest. Again, He, who is unmanifest, it is He only manifest. In this light, what is the Svarupa of Ma's play of Sadhana? Ma calls Her Sadhana a play. How can sadhana be a play? Where the sadhaka, sadhana and object of sadhana is the same One, there, what else is sadhana but a play?
Then, in this play, what is the object of attainment?
"Through Her own kheyaIa, She is in Her own play with Herself. Just as all kriyas are in the context of simple observation of a perceptible body-from movement, seeing, hearing, sitting etc., that is, all kriyas in entirety - so also, in the play of sadhana, explanation of Tattwa, etc., in THAT only".SADHANA